Shillong, April 6: The Voice of the People Party has petitioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi opposing the proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 2026.
Im the letter addressed to Modi, Ardent said, “I write this representation on behalf of the Voice of the People Party (VPP) to express our deep concern regarding the proposed amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 2026, currently under consideration”.
“At the outset, we acknowledge the legitimate role of the Government of India in ensuring transparency, accountability, and national security in matters concerning foreign contributions. However, certain provisions reportedly proposed in the amendment have generated widespread apprehension among civil society organisations, particularly those engaged in charitable, educational, and humanitarian work. Of particular concern is the provision that enables the state to assume control over the assets of organisations whose FCRA registration is cancelled. While regulatory oversight is necessary, such sweeping powers raise serious questions about proportionality, due process, and the potential for misuse. Many institutions especially in the North Eastern, including Meghalaya have been established over decades through lawful means and serve as pillars of social welfare in areas such as education, healthcare, and rural development”, he said.
According to the VPP leader, it is pertinent to note that many institutions are run by minority communities, including Christian organisations, which have historically played a crucial role in delivering essential services in remote and underserved areas. Any policy framework that creates uncertainty regarding the ownership and management of such institutions may inadvertently disrupt these services and affect the livelihoods of countless beneficiaries.
“In a state like Meghalaya, where non governmental organisations complement governmental efforts in development, overly stringent regulatory measures may hinder grassroots initiatives and weaken community-based institutions. We are concerned that the proposed provisions, if implemented without adequate safeguards, may lead to unintended consequences that go beyond the stated objectives of regulation”, Ardent said.
The VPP said it believes that a balanced approach can be achieved- one that safeguards national interests while also protecting the invaluable contributions of civil society and non-governmental organisations to nation-building. We remain hopeful that the concerns of the people, particularly those from vulnerable and remote regions, will be given due consideration
The demands of the VPP
1 Reconsider provisions relating to the takeover or control of assets of organisations, ensuring that property rights and institutional autonomy are adequately protected.
2 Ensure that any action against organisations is guided by principles of natural justice, transparency, and due process.
3 Engage in wider consultations with stakeholders, including representatives from civil society, minority institutions, and the Northeastern states including Meghalaya, before finalising the amendments.
4 Introduce safeguards to ensure that genuine charitable and developmental work is not adversely affected..
